First Mathers knocked on, even though it then hit his thigh and arguably went backwards. Then Riley seemed to go for the ball with his foot and didn't connect thus fouling Farrell in the process?

Not a penalty try but surely Wigan's ball?

I can understand the ref messing up but this is the vid ref with technology in front of him?

We'd just made it 16-16 all and the momentum going our way, a set of 6 on their line could have changed the course of the game.

Losing possession ,composure and not enough straight hard running generally through the game "especially when Riddell was off the pitch" changed the course of it .

That was the course of the game, I'm on about changing it.

You played the advantage.
I dont necessarily agree with it but that's the ruling

I thought liam farrel should have been in the starting line up, he looks like he's going to be very good player.

What advantage? We never held the ball?

no the ref played the advantage, none was coming as we didnt regain possession, its like a double knock on, so should have been Wigan scrum

We went 10 yards n almost scored. That was the advantage.

Correct decision

we didnt go 10 yards the ball travelled 10 yards but we didnt have it

We dnt have too. We knocked on over the line which was over the advantage line. Correct call.

disgaree, we didnt have posession. But, I suppose its each to their own

AT no point did Wigan have advantage, if he collects the ball then knocks on, fair enough, but Rileys kick prevents that.