That's a bit harsh. Its just an issue that's never come up before, so isn't codified. The cap exemption will only have been applied a few times since it was first mooted (be interesting to know, as absolutely certain pre season-ending injuries aren't that common). Anyone who has any experience of contracts or legislation will know that these things are often drafted with what seem to be "obvious" gaps. Filling those gaps, despite how obvious they might be, often isn't straightforward, as there may be a tortuous process to do so.

Croft out to the end of the month with his hamstring. Annoying, but hopefully Sinfield gets hus chance with Frawley in the hooker role.

Just because one person comes on here and says we have signed someone , history tells us it may not always be true

I aggree 100%
With regards to Kallum


Apparently, the deal with Leeds was agreed in principle,but was not signed  because they wanted Kallum to play for Salford in the CC game v Catalans.


Although Salford are now clearly holding out for the best deal and Saints are still sniffing around Watkins and have put an offer in.


Although at present they currently don't have the cap space.


Kallum definitely wants to sign for Leeds though.


It's all getting a bit messy,but Salford are clearly very desperate for all the cash that they can get.