They must be paying us a huge fee.

Who do we go after?

Yep. Yet another example of Diplodocus size tail wagging a medium size dog. An excuse for clubs who don't bother to develop their own talent to try and buy a cheap, quick fix from Oz. As for the 14 teams, you can bet the 12 existing ones won't be sharing the TV money that already has most living on the breadline. Complete madness. 

What’s betting they say Toulouse and Catalans can play in SL but on the condition they don’t take Sky money.

The while Nigel Wood thing is a joke 

Seems very much like it. 



Removing the quota entirely was also on the cards according to reports. 



Without rehashing the whole 14 team SL debate, it appears the game is back in the loop of coming up with a solution then looking for a problem to solve.

Doesn`t Nigel Woods have a financial interest in the Bulls who I`m sure he will be pushing to take one of the spots should we expand to 14 clubs.
And why don`t the RL/SL get several players on board in order to look at how the game should be developing.
The likes of Sculthorpe, McGuire, Hall etc would offer a lot more than what we currently have even if it is in an advisory capacity.
IMG imo have done didly squat.

IMG Have done quite a lot, all the metrics for crowds, viewers, digital views are up, they have forced clubs to up their game. You can't really judge img 3 years into a 12 year partnership, but in true RL style the clubs owners get impatient and think they can fix (an issue that isn't there) by bringing their mate back, it's a joke.

What you've got is a people who have a history of failing getting rid of an super successful sports marketing agency, as I say classic RL.